Abstract. This paper explores the use of Support Vector Machines in contrast to conventional text classification methods SVMs will prove to be very robust. Index Terms—text classification, support vector machine, web mining, tropical of text categorization using Bayesian classifier and decision tree learning. documents with categories by first using a training set to adapt the classifier to the feature set of the particular document set . The machine learning process is.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Portuguese|
|ePub File Size:||17.31 MB|
|PDF File Size:||18.56 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Sign up for free]|
Based on ideas from Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Learning To Classify Text Using Support Vector Machines presents a new approach to generating text DRM-free; Included format: PDF; ebooks can be used on all reading devices. Machine learning has many applications in real life. It is routinely used in banking (for detecting fraudulent transactions (Dorronsoro et al. Request PDF on ResearchGate | Learning To Classify Text Using Support Vector Machines | Based on ideas from Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Learning.
Skip to search form Skip to main content. Text Categorization with Support Vector Machines: It analyzes the particular properties of learning with text data and identifies why SVMs arc appropriate for this task. Empirical results support the theoretical findings. SVMs achieve substantial improvements over the currently best performing methods and behave robustly over a variety of different learning tasks. View via Publisher.
However, bear in mind that text classification using SVM can be just as good for other tasks as well, such as sentiment analysis or intent classification:. The next step is to define the tags we want to use in our classifier.
By tagging some examples, SVM will learn that for a particular input text , we expect a particular output:. Once you have finished taking care of your training data, you will have to name your classifier before you can keep training it, start using it, or change its settings.
Type some descriptive name in the textbox and click Finish:. Just give it a try, go to Run and try it out. Chances are that some results are not as good as you expect, especially if you have not uploaded a lot of training data.
Besides, Monkeylearn makes it really simple and straightforward to create text classifiers.
Within minutes, you will be able to get really good results out of custom texts classifiers using SVM which will give you great new insights on your data. Why don't you give it a try? From Texts to Vectors Support vector machines is an algorithm that determines the best decision boundary between vectors that belong to a given group or category and vectors that do not belong to it. The best decision boundary would look like this: However, bear in mind that text classification using SVM can be just as good for other tasks as well, such as sentiment analysis or intent classification: Then, go back to the previous screen and click the CSV card.
The screen below will appear: By tagging some examples, SVM will learn that for a particular input text , we expect a particular output: Type some descriptive name in the textbox and click Finish: Start using Text Classification today! Several algorithms for reconstructing 3D structure from contacts have been developed in both the structure prediction and determination NMR literature [ 5 - 8 ].
Contact map prediction is also useful for inferring protein folding rates and pathways [ 9 , 10 ]. Due to its importance, contact prediction has received considerable attention over the last decade.
For instance, contact prediction methods have been evaluated in the fifth, sixth, and seventh editions of the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction CASP experiment [ 11 - 15 ].
A number of different methods for predicting contacts have been developed. These methods can be classified roughly into two non-exclusive categories: 1 statistical correlated mutations approaches [ 16 - 22 ]; and 2 machine learning approaches [ 23 - 34 ].
The former uses correlated mutations of residues to predict contacts. The latter uses machine learning methods such as neural networks, self organizing map, hidden Markov models, and support vector machines to predict 2D contacts from the primary sequence, as well as other 1D features such as relative solvent accessibility and secondary structure.
In spite of steady progress, contact map prediction remains however a largely unsolved challenge.
Here we describe a method that uses support vector machines together with a large set of informative features to improve contact map prediction. The training dataset contains proteins and the test dataset contains 48 proteins.
Sensitivity is the percentage of native contacts that are predicted to be contacts. Specificity is the percentage of predicted contacts that are present in the native structure.
The sensitivity and specificity of a predictor depend also on the threshold used to separate 'contact' from 'non-contact' predictions. To compare SVMcon and CMAPpro fairly, we choose to evaluate them at their break-even point, where sensitivity is equal to specificity as in [ 37 ].
At the break-even point, the sensitivity and specificity of SVMcon is