Back. Standards PDF Cover Page SAE JA ('A Guide to the Reliability- Centered Maintenance (RCM) Standard') Society of Automotive Engineers [ SAE]. anything else will not offer the full benefit of RCM, as supported by SAE JA and JA standards available at tvnovellas.info Applying the Four Basic. Definition of RCM Using SAE. JA and JA Standards . failure mode is unlikely to occur before the next check. Reference: SAE JA Standard.
|Language:||English, Spanish, German|
|Genre:||Children & Youth|
|ePub File Size:||18.52 MB|
|PDF File Size:||9.15 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Sign up for free]|
SAE Technical Standards Board Rules provide that: "This report is published by SAE to advance the state of technical and engineering sciences. The use of this. SAE JA ("A Guide to the Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) Standard" ) amplifies and clarifies each of the key criteria listed in SAE. SAE JA ("A Guide to the Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) Standard" ) amplifies and clarifies each of the key criteria listed in SAE JA
Context[ edit ] It is generally used to achieve improvements in fields such as the establishment of safe minimum levels of maintenance, changes to operating procedures and strategies and the establishment of capital maintenance regimes and plans. Successful implementation of RCM will lead to increase in cost effectiveness, machine uptime, and a greater understanding of the level of risk that the organization is managing. John Moubray characterized RCM as a process to establish the safe minimum levels of maintenance. This starts with the seven questions below, worked through in the order that they are listed: 1. What is the item supposed to do and its associated performance standards? In what ways can it fail to provide the required functions?
European Journal of Operational Research — Defense Standard, U. Ministry of Defence, Bath, England. Springer, New York. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva. Taylor and Francis, London. Department of Defense, Washington, DC. Industrial Press, New York.
Naval Air Systems Command, U. Summer Nuclear Generating Station. What are the events that cause each failure? What happens when each failure occurs? In what way does each failure matter?
What systematic task can be performed proactively to prevent, or to diminish to a satisfactory degree, the consequences of the failure? What must be done if a suitable preventive task cannot be found? Reliability centered maintenance is an engineering framework that enables the definition of a complete maintenance regimen.
It regards maintenance as the means to maintain the functions a user may require of machinery in a defined operating context. As a discipline it enables machinery stakeholders to monitor, assess, predict and generally understand the working of their physical assets.
The second part of the analysis is to apply the "RCM logic", which helps determine the appropriate maintenance tasks for the identified failure modes in the FMECA.
Once the logic is complete for all elements in the FMECA, the resulting list of maintenance is "packaged", so that the periodicities of the tasks are rationalised to be called up in work packages; it is important not to destroy the applicability of maintenance in this phase.
Lastly, RCM is kept live throughout the "in-service" life of machinery, where the effectiveness of the maintenance is kept under constant review and adjusted in light of the experience gained.
RCM can be used to create a cost-effective maintenance strategy to address dominant causes of equipment failure.
It is a systematic approach to defining a routine maintenance program composed of cost-effective tasks that preserve important functions. The important functions of a piece of equipment to preserve with routine maintenance are identified, their dominant failure modes and causes determined and the consequences of failure ascertained.
Levels of criticality are assigned to the consequences of failure. Some functions are not critical and are left to "run to failure" while other functions must be preserved at all cost. Maintenance tasks are selected that address the dominant failure causes. This process directly addresses maintenance preventable failures. Failures caused by unlikely events, non-predictable acts of nature, etc.
When the risk of such failures is very high, RCM encourages and sometimes mandates the user to consider changing something which will reduce the risk to a tolerable level. Among some of the paradigm shifts inspired by RCM were: an understanding that the vast majority of failures are not necessarily linked to the age of the asset changing from efforts to predict life expectancies to trying to manage the process of failure an understanding of the difference between the requirements of assets from a user perspective, and the design reliability of the asset an understanding of the importance of managing assets on condition often referred to as condition monitoring, condition based maintenance and predictive maintenance an understanding of four basic routine maintenance tasks linking levels of tolerable risk to maintenance strategy development Today RCM is defined in the standard SAE JA, Evaluation Criteria for Reliability-Centered Maintenance RCM Processes.
This sets out the minimum criteria for what is, and for what is not, able to be defined as RCM. The standard is a watershed event in the ongoing evolution of the discipline of physical asset management. Prior to the development of the standard many processes were labeled as RCM even though they were not true to the intentions and the principles in the original report that defined the term publicly.
Today companies can use this standard to ensure that the processes, services and software they purchase and implement conforms with what is defined as RCM, ensuring the best possibility of achieving the many benefits attributable to rigorous application of RCM. Modern RCM gives threats to the environment a separate classification, though most forms manage them in the same way as threats to safety.
RCM offers five principal options among the risk management strategies: Predictive maintenance tasks, Preventive Restoration or Preventive Replacement maintenance tasks, Detective maintenance tasks, Run-to-Failure, and One-time changes to the "system" changes to hardware design, to operations, or to other things. RCM also offers specific criteria to use when selecting a risk management strategy for a system that presents a specific risk when it fails.
Some are technical in nature can the proposed task detect the condition it needs to detect? Others are goal-oriented is it reasonably likely that the proposed task-and-task-frequency will reduce the risk to a tolerable level? The criteria are often presented in the form of a decision-logic diagram, though this is not intrinsic to the nature of the process.
Starting in the late s, an independent initiative led by John Moubray corrected some early flaws in the process, and adapted it for use in the wider industry. In the two decades since this approach called by the author RCM2 was first released, industry has undergone massive change with advances in lean thinking and efficiency methods. At this point in time many methods sprung up that took an approach of reducing the rigour of the RCM approach. The result was the propagation of methods that called themselves RCM, yet had little in common with the original concepts.
In some cases these were misleading and inefficient, while in other cases they were even dangerous. Since each initiative is sponsored by one or more consulting firms eager to help clients use it, there is still considerable disagreement about their relative dangers or merits. Also there is a tendency for consulting firms to promote a software package as an alternative methodology in place of the knowledge required to perform analyses.